Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758158AbZAWDbs (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:31:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754704AbZAWDbk (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:31:40 -0500 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:50355 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750896AbZAWDbj (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:31:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:31:33 +0100 From: Nick Piggin To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Pekka Enberg , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Lin Ming , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator Message-ID: <20090123033133.GB20098@wotan.suse.de> References: <20090121143008.GV24891@wotan.suse.de> <20090121145918.GA11311@elte.hu> <20090121165600.GA16695@wotan.suse.de> <20090121174010.GA2998@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090121174010.GA2998@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1345 Lines: 34 On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:40:10PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Nick Piggin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:59:18PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > Mind if i nitpick a bit about minor style issues? Since this is going to > > > be the next Linux SLAB allocator we might as well do it perfectly :-) > > > > Well here is an incremental patch which should get most of the issues > > you pointed out, most of the sane ones that checkpatch pointed out, and > > a few of my own ;) > > here's an incremental one ontop of your incremental patch, enhancing some > more issues. I now find the code very readable! :-) Thanks! I'll go through it and apply it. I'll raise any issues if I am particularly against them ;) > ( in case you are wondering about the placement of bit_spinlock.h - that > file needs fixing, just move it to the top of the file and see the build > break. But that's a separate patch.) Ah, SLQB doesn't use bit spinlocks anyway, so I'll just get rid of that. I'll see if there are any other obviously unneeded headers too. Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/