Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759457AbZAWSwx (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:52:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752814AbZAWSwp (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:52:45 -0500 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.25]:8391 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750974AbZAWSwo (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:52:44 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=s2NbceiKiNJH0BYXo4XBm0N1P1dzHeZ/dqfVcV4a2x9uiQ+KCnIt8KY3FbaJVbsajL sA1htsSX/Wt/HTQbv6ZrtJdI22E3dRUT0/vAftOqpwRGfuEdZnAdgwU2DUx74w9FdnCC RBe1MSB58pHJj9o9xNxiZZi1N2ifK5yrP8YYA= Message-ID: <497A11F5.9090005@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:52:37 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel , LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: inline asm semantics: output constraint width smaller than input References: <497A0500.3080706@gmail.com> <20090123181721.GA32545@elte.hu> <497A0C0A.7080207@gmail.com> <20090123183019.GA5984@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090123183019.GA5984@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1224 Lines: 30 On 2009-01-23 20:30, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * T?r?k Edwin wrote: > > >> Having said that, llvm-gcc is not yet able to compile the full Linux >> kernel on its own [for example the boot code, due to asm(".code16gcc")], >> but with LLVM 2.4 it was possible to build "arch=UM", and "arch=X86" (by >> using gcc to build the bootcode). I'd like LLVM 2.5 to be able to build >> the kernel, so I'll file bugs for llvm/kernel depending on where the >> problem is. >> > > Could we get LLVM folks on the Cc: and see how difficult it would be to > fix this on the LLVM side? Asm constraints are used all around the place > and different input/output types are very common. I've added LLVMDev to Cc. Your first post to the list may take a little longer to reach it (first post is moderated by listmaster, no subscription required). [For those who missed the initial conversation, see: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3373#c9] Best regards, --Edwin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/