Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752989AbZAZRP5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:15:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751611AbZAZRPt (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:15:49 -0500 Received: from smtp122.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.95]:24364 "HELO smtp122.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751448AbZAZRPs (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:15:48 -0500 X-YMail-OSG: CLTEOvsVM1k6IUyzN5PZxmWpMxVTfg0yiY2PdT7Q1MF0l129tEgQx3Y5dnMRz6rHbeVF_1eN98co_ukoPWucrCYYuNH5Q1py_Bfc20fbjaYd1fVqGw_7mM7shM4FmxvGTNyKAxoA56LIF2UeI2818qc18SK.2LPkiE1kkzf0movwoiK5ga8xP8kBfzS.SCJYkPjrwnAm3NFQMyzXUj0wmS_L7nc- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Subject: Re: Spamming linux-kernel and linux-scsi by out-of-tree patches (LIO) From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Vladislav Bolkhovitin , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20090126081905.7c112170@infradead.org> References: <497DB7D0.8000302@vlnb.net> <1232984234.3248.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <497DDFF8.8070707@vlnb.net> <20090126081905.7c112170@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:15:24 -0800 Message-Id: <1232990124.24642.156.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2268 Lines: 59 On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 08:19 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:08:24 +0300 > Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > > > I wouldn't object if Nicholas des the same and send in linux-scsi > > and linux-kernel a complete patchset, which we will review and > > discuss. But he sends *intermediate* patches and this looks for me > > like a violation of fundamental rules/intention of Linux kernel > > mailing lists, hence I complain. > > > > So, should I understand your words that you agree if I also start > > sending intermediate patches for SCST to linux-scsi/linux-kernel? > > > > > > > I am thoroughly surprised by this email exchange. > From where I sit, there is almost no such thing as posting patches too > early. Really. Transparency and early review/feedaback is by far > more important than ignoring a few more patches in an area you > don't careabout. > For those wanting to know more about "Release Early, Release Often": http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s04.html Linus's open development policy was the very opposite of cathedral-building. Linux's Internet archives were burgeoning, multiple distributions were being floated. And all of this was driven by an unheard-of frequency of core system releases. Linus was treating his users as co-developers in the most effective possible way: 7. Release early. Release often. And listen to your customers. Linus's innovation wasn't so much in doing quick-turnaround releases incorporating lots of user feedback (something like this had been Unix-world tradition for a long time), but in scaling it up to a level of intensity that matched the complexity of what he was developing. In those early times (around 1991) it wasn't unknown for him to release a new kernel more than once a day! Because he cultivated his base of co-developers and leveraged the Internet for collaboration harder than anyone else, this worked. --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/