Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754294AbZA0Kfd (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:35:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752807AbZA0KfU (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:35:20 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com ([209.85.219.21]:35703 "EHLO mail-ew0-f21.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752202AbZA0KfT (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:35:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=oNT1CtYOGwLkP4NHUZ9EPJ3E386kEgr9KpWwr40Chq3jVKMJQgUCDQg5pi2RE0OgWs 3qhQdKJHg7Wq7HsgYJ1esk6Bom3O4UPZeAj2l7qMpBgFRD2Pn1T3aGKiA41VfkYaKFkl pFpQW3Zdcffal7sjwIbRaUtOybdWta65seW24= Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:35:11 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Herbert Xu Cc: David Miller , zbr@ioremap.net, w@1wt.eu, dada1@cosmosbay.com, ben@zeus.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once Message-ID: <20090127103511.GE4197@ff.dom.local> References: <20090125.212203.15909648.davem@davemloft.net> <20090127071130.GA29125@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090127075418.GB4197@ff.dom.local> <20090127100958.GA30239@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090127100958.GA30239@gondor.apana.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1069 Lines: 24 On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:09:58PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:54:18AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > > Yes, but ip_append_data() (and skb_append_datato_frags() for > > NETIF_F_UFO only, so currently not a problem), uses this differently, > > and these pages in sk->sk_sndmsg_page could leak or be used after > > kfree. (I didn't track locking in these other places). > > It'll be freed when the socket is freed so that should be fine. > I don't think so: these places can overwrite sk->sk_sndmsg_page left after tcp_sendmsg(), or skb_splice_bits() now, with NULL or a new pointer without put_page() (they only reference copied chunks and expect auto freeing). On the other hand, if tcp_sendmsg() reads after them it could use a pointer after the page is freed, I guess. Cheers, Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/