Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754224AbZA1SLf (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:11:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752006AbZA1SLO (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:11:14 -0500 Received: from tomts43.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.110]:65361 "EHLO tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751940AbZA1SLN (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:11:13 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuwEAHwsgElMQWt2/2dsb2JhbACBbstFhUcG Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:10:53 -0500 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Nick Piggin , LKML , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Jim Keniston , systemtap-ml , "Frank Ch. Eigler" Subject: Re: [BUG][kprobes][vunmap?]: kprobes may cause memory corruption Message-ID: <20090128181053.GC9908@Krystal> References: <497FC3B1.7050805@redhat.com> <497FE895.1080708@redhat.com> <20090128154824.GA6025@Krystal> <49808EEF.1020700@redhat.com> <20090128171331.GA9006@Krystal> <49809CCE.40409@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49809CCE.40409@redhat.com> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080 X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.21.3-grsec (i686) X-Uptime: 13:10:33 up 27 days, 18:08, 3 users, load average: 1.78, 1.33, 1.16 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3216 Lines: 108 * Masami Hiramatsu (mhiramat@redhat.com) wrote: > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > * Masami Hiramatsu (mhiramat@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > [...] > >>> All this called in a loop. This would help isolating the "vmap" part of > >>> the issue. If this test is not enough, then we should maybe try > >>> something like this in a kernel module (which does what text_poke does > >>> with vmalloc, more or less) in a loop : > >>> > >>> char somedata[PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE))); > >>> char copydata[PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE))); > >> Should both of them have PAGE_SIZE*2? > >> > > > > Yes. > > > >>> void test_vmap(void) > >>> } > >>> struct page *pages[2]; > >>> char *vaddr; > >>> int i; > >>> > >>> for (i = 0; i < 2 * PAGE_SIZE; i++) > >>> copydata[i] = somedata[i]; > >>> page[0] = virt_to_page(&somedata); > >>> BUG_ON(!page[0]); > >>> page[1] = virt_to_page(&somedata + PAGE_SIZE); > >>> BUG_ON(!page[1]); > > Oops, these should be vmalloc_to_page(), shouldn't it? > Yes, my bad. That should fix your oopses. Mathieu > >>> vaddr = vmap(pages, 2, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL); > >>> BUG_ON(!vaddr); > >>> > >>> for (i = 0; i < 2 * PAGE_SIZE; i++) > >>> vaddr[i] = copydata[i] + 1; > >>> > >>> vunmap(vaddr); > >>> > >>> for (i = 0; i < 2 * PAGE_SIZE; i++) > >>> BUG_ON(somedata[i] != copydata[i] + 1); > >>> } > >> Hmm, when I ran above code, it hit the last BUG_ON(). > >> I checked that somedata[i] didn't updated. > >> > > > > Do you hit the BUG_ON after the first loop ? > > At the first loop, it hit the BUG_ON. > > >>> Given you don't seem to have hit the > >>> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > >>> BUG_ON(((char *)addr)[i] != ((char *)opcode)[i]); > >>> test at the end of text_poke, > >> However, when I ran kprobe-based test, it doesn't hit the BUG_ON() > >> in text_poke(). > >> > > > > The variable declarations should have been 2*PAGE_SIZE, hopefully you > > fixed them. > > Sure, > > > There is also a sync_core() in text_poke. It should not matter, but > > maybe that could help ? > > Adding sync_core() could not help me... anyway, I'll try again > with using vmalloc_to_page(). > > >>> I suspect the write through the vmapped > >>> area is correctly done, but that the problem may lay in the mm layer. > >>> Maybe it's running out of pre-allocated vmap areas or something like > >>> this ? > >> I haven't seen vmalloc failure message on 2.6.29-rc2. > >> > > > > It could be because the available vmalloc space is slightly higher. > > Looking into the lazy vunmap threshold would be useful. > > > > You could also try with loop values higher than 400. > > OK, Thanks, > > -- > Masami Hiramatsu > > Software Engineer > Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc. > Software Solutions Division > > e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com > -- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/