Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:54:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:54:44 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-040-169.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.40.169]:7825 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:54:32 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [RFC] Page table sharing Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:59:13 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Linus Torvalds , dmccr@us.ibm.com, Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm@kvack.org, Robert Love , Rik van Riel , mingo@redhat.com, Andrew Morton , manfred@colorfullife.com, wli@holomorphy.com In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On February 18, 2002 08:04 pm, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On February 18, 2002 09:09 am, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > Since copy_page_range would not copy shared page tables, I'm wrong to > > > point there. But __pte_alloc does copy shared page tables (to unshare > > > them), and needs them to be stable while it does so: so locking against > > > swap_out really is required. It also needs locking against read faults, > > > and they against each other: but there I imagine it's just a matter of > > > dropping the write arg to __pte_alloc, going back to pte_alloc again. I'm not sure what you mean here, you're not suggesting we should unshare the page table on read fault are you? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/