Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 20:06:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 20:06:35 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-040-169.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.40.169]:55185 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 20:06:30 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Mark Hahn Subject: Re: [RFC] Page table sharing Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 02:11:20 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Cc: Kernel Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On February 19, 2002 02:01 am, Mark Hahn wrote: > > [benchmarks] > > > > (Look at the last one, the nonshared fork forces the system into swap. I ran > > it twice to verify, the second time from a clean reboot. This is another > > reason why shared page tables are good.) > > that's really nice. http://hahn.mcmaster.ca/~hahn/shpg.png > if you like graphs. but did you swap the last two sets, > or does a reboot actually make it take longer? I wouldn't read too much into the variance, swapping is fairly brain-damaged at the moment. Please stand by for an update after we kick around the question of how to repair the swap locking and we'll get better numbers. They are going to be in the same ballpark, hopefully with less variance. Thanks a lot for the graph. (I took the liberty of replying to the kernel list.) -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/