Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id <S129325AbQK3CyI>; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 21:54:08 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
        id <S132444AbQK3CwC>; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 21:52:02 -0500
Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:25107 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org")
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S132363AbQK3Cvw>;
        Wed, 29 Nov 2000 21:51:52 -0500
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 17:11:20 -0800
Message-Id: <200011300111.eAU1BKG32621@moisil.dev.hydraweb.com>
From: Ion Badulescu <ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: another problem disappeared
In-Reply-To: <UTC200011300028.BAA150956.aeb@aak.cwi.nl>
User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.18pre23 (i586))
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 01:28:13 +0100 (MET), Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:

> (I am still a bit curious: did other people see this?
> Did someone fix a known problem with net(filter) or say /proc?
> It would be a pity if this disappeared by coincidence
> and appears again next month.)

No problems here, and I've been using various 2.4.0testX for 5
months to do masquerading, without any problems. My firewall 
is running 2.4.0test11 right now, and this mail is going through
it. :-)


Ion

-- 
  It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
            than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/