Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758358AbZA2UFh (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:05:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751552AbZA2UF2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:05:28 -0500 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.28]:2457 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751500AbZA2UF1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:05:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090129204104.60bf46a2@i1501.lan.towertech.it> References: <1233018263.14510.112.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090127122156.784924f4@i1501.lan.towertech.it> <9ae48b020901291121n319be519o473db5fdc031ea8f@mail.gmail.com> <20090129204104.60bf46a2@i1501.lan.towertech.it> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:05:26 -0800 Message-ID: <9ae48b020901291205ie0db5abj1a8c06528b9b46e8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] x86: i2c rtc instead of cmos rtc From: Ed Swierk To: Alessandro Zummo Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 648 Lines: 16 On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > While I can't judge on what's convenient to you, I do not feel > fine in having a kernel option to disable the rtc and another to load > a specific i2c one. Would you prefer a single option to select the rtc (something like rtc.device={cmos|i2c,ds1339,1,0x68})? Or do you object to any option at all? --Ed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/