Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754633AbZA3F5f (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:57:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751378AbZA3F51 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:57:27 -0500 Received: from utopia.booyaka.com ([72.9.107.138]:40056 "EHLO utopia.booyaka.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751358AbZA3F50 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:57:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:57:24 -0700 (MST) From: Paul Walmsley To: Russell King - ARM Linux cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH A 01/10] OMAP2/3: Add non-CORE DPLL rate set code and M, N programming In-Reply-To: <20090129142303.GA18233@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <20090128020447.7244.80496.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090128021243.7244.6362.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090129142303.GA18233@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1406 Lines: 42 On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:12:47PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > +/* Non-CORE DPLL rate set code */ > > + > > +/* > > + * omap3_noncore_dpll_program - set non-core DPLL M,N values directly > > + * @clk: struct clk * of DPLL to set > > + * @m: DPLL multiplier to set > > + * @n: DPLL divider to set > > + * @freqsel: FREQSEL value to set > > + * > > + * Program the DPLL with the supplied M, N values, and wait for the DPLL to > > + * lock.. Returns -EINVAL upon error, or 0 upon success. > > + */ > > +static int omap3_noncore_dpll_program(struct clk *clk, u16 m, u8 n, u16 freqsel) > > +{ > > + struct dpll_data *dd; > > + u32 v; > > + > > + if (!clk) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + dd = clk->dpll_data; > > + if (!dd) > > + return -EINVAL; > > Final point... this is only called from the function below, which also > checks that clk and clk->dpll_data are both non-NULL. So these checks > are unnecessary. Okay. Do you want to take care of that in your merged version of this patch, or would you like me to send an updated version, along with that custom dpll4 set_rate function? - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/