Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:24:48 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: UV fix uv_flush_send_and_wait
Message-ID: <20090130152448.GE27549@elte.hu>
References: <E1LSeXm-0007ck-9j@eag09.americas.sgi.com> <20090130150257.GA27549@elte.hu> <49831ACE.1020300@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49831ACE.1020300@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1153
Lines: 35


* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
> >>
> >> uv_flush_send_and_wait() should return a pointer if the broadcast
> >> remote tlb shootdown requests fail. That causes the conventional IPI
> >> method of shootdown to be used.
> >>
> >> Diffed against 2.6.29-rc2
> >>   (Ingo's tree)
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c |    2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Applied to tip/x86/urgnet, thanks Cliff!
> 
> Ingo, this patch shouldn't go into x86/urgent.  This patch is to fix a 
> bug introduced by a patch in the percpu branch and not applicable to 
> x86/urgent.

ah, indeed, the UV cleanup you did. Please pick up this fix then too into 
your tree - the two should go together. I dropped it from x86/urgent.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/