Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S291254AbSBSL0y>; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 06:26:54 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S291257AbSBSL0l>; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 06:26:41 -0500
Received: from xsmtp.ethz.ch ([129.132.97.6]:1406 "EHLO xfe3.d.ethz.ch")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S291254AbSBSL0S>;
	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 06:26:18 -0500
Message-ID: <3C72359C.6020008@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:23:08 +0100
From: Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@debian.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg Banks <gnb@alphalink.com.au>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Disgusted with kbuild developers
In-Reply-To: <fa.h0m1njv.tgmh9v@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2002 11:26:16.0574 (UTC) FILETIME=[3EC8D1E0:01C1B938]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



Greg Banks wrote:

> G'day,
> 
> Michal Jaegermann <michal@harddata.com> wrote:
> 
>>I also cannot help not to notice that the previous bit flare-up about
>>CML2 on lkml was quelled to a great extent when somebody annouced that
>>he is rewriting required tools in C.
>>
> 
>   I believe I'm the anonymous `he' you refer to.

There are two other projects of C implementation of CML2:

cml2config in sourceforce, and another I lost the link.


	giacomo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/