Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754207AbZAaCke (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:40:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752383AbZAaCkX (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:40:23 -0500 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.247]:29590 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751839AbZAaCkW (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:40:22 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=QSHM2DWkvGOpfL+Wq0g9bQJtAsS/Ojm4itN0vG0xEMUa6FHTU74Wm7Vd8Die7lVTBY j8yBxRmV5EH1wfKCHDhrlxvFChG0XDSApmFc/JHCbiEslBRRCzIRmMdiYFhhPtv9NCKv dw81RfN+h0PWnP5BKhd+9A+kTPUrbHt90f6Dg= Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:40:15 -0500 (EST) From: Parag Warudkar X-X-Sender: parag@parag-desktop To: Linus Torvalds cc: Parag Warudkar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Matt Carlson , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200901310059.17746.rjw@sisk.pl> <200901310138.51214.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1602 Lines: 38 On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > If you can try the patch I just sent out, and use that as a base for > trying to track down why the heck the legacy code doesn't work, that would > be great. It might fix it (assuming my guess about "restore_state while in > PCI_D3 doesn't work" was correct), but quite frankly, it's equally > possible that it just makes things worse. But it would be really > interesting to hear.. Sure - will do. > > Your machine does seem to be interesting, in that not only does it have a > PCI-E bridge in it (the eeepc I was playing around with at LCA does not), > but judging by the lost config state I also suspect that it actually loses > power during STR. Not sure what the significance of eeepc is in this case - mine being a standard Intel 5400 chipset I would have thought that's the last place to look for interesting things! > Which is not at all necessarily a given - I suspect it depends on just how > the power rails are set up on the motherboard. The fact that PCI-E bridges > have apparently worked for others implies that your problems don't happen > for everybody, and may relate to that issue. Do we know this for sure that PCI-E bridges + Suspend have worked for others - In this thread at least I think people reported tg3 worked but not necessarily with a PCI-E bridge. Parag -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/