Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752548AbZAaFSS (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:18:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750844AbZAaFSH (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:18:07 -0500 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.28]:51205 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750840AbZAaFSE (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:18:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TRWtPG+hhil1YA/BaCoOQAWpIn29G9FNU9PxpcmN+hgD/MopK/bh6VnWAALFJCPN/G e65ugisiNFuJJ69c+raU+4Blzk+bTw7AaTwo4AdMkvHvZUHdDPY/KXOBxbFdfpZnt6j3 VCiN2iqWMGEqscYo9zxKRMZUOn4b+eHo+EOQ0= Message-ID: <4983DF0A.6030402@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:18:02 -0600 From: Robert Hancock User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartosz SKOWRON CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: libata - anomaly performance with NCQ References: <77887e110901301623u746535f2q7dcc37cd40d2cc56@mail.gmail.com> <4983A446.5080809@shaw.ca> <77887e110901301725p64f5ab4fk341a9bfaf6715a7b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <77887e110901301725p64f5ab4fk341a9bfaf6715a7b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1536 Lines: 35 Bartosz SKOWRON wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: > >>> 1) cause the title contains "with hdparm"...does it mean that >>> physically the performance is OK and only hdparm shows something >>> wrong? >> Well, hdparm is a fairly crude benchmark but there's likely at least some >> impact in other usage. > > It's not an answer for my question. So, should I check with other > benchmarks? I thought that this's issue is investigated and the answer > is common. Do you recommend any "not crude" benchmarks? :) bonnie++ is one I've used, I'm sure there are others.. Of course, what do you compare the results to.. > > >>> 2) there is an information about upgrading firmware. as far as i know >>> Seagate doesn't publish firmwares. So the only way is to contact >>> seagate support, send the hdd and wait for the new one? >> I think Seagate can provide firmware updaters for the user to use, but >> normally only if you contact support I think. > > I will send the email cause there is no phone line for my country. > BTW. upgrade firmware == damage data? It shouldn't, but some people with the recent 7200.11 drives that did firmware upgrades reported it bricked the drive, so backing up the data first would definitely be a good idea.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/