Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758921AbZCBDGs (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:06:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757299AbZCBDGj (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:06:39 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:18118 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757180AbZCBDGi (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:06:38 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,286,1233561600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="435216645" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e820 end address with EFI From: Huang Ying To: Brian Maly Cc: Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <49AB4AFC.3010503@redhat.com> References: <49A965AD.10701@redhat.com> <86802c440902282014he17bb6an1f59872ef30db0c5@mail.gmail.com> <86802c440902282142p14f623b8td8a88600ff2a6bbe@mail.gmail.com> <49AAEC79.3000808@redhat.com> <1235956068.6204.143.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> <49AB38E7.60305@redhat.com> <1235960016.6204.170.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> <49AB4171.7000508@kernel.org> <1235960708.6204.176.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> <49AB4521.8010909@kernel.org> <1235961428.6204.190.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> <49AB4AFC.3010503@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VJk2upsFck4jsAyQNqHH" Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:06:35 +0800 Message-Id: <1235963195.6204.202.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1121 Lines: 36 --=-VJk2upsFck4jsAyQNqHH Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 10:57 +0800, Brian Maly wrote: > In looking at an older (working) kernel a bit more and it looks like=20 > efi_ioremap() is not called in efi_enter_virtual_mode() pre 2.6.27 on=20 > this hardware, so we never followed the efi_ioremap codepath up until=20 > recently. This explains the regression. Yes. That is why the regression is triggered after 2.6.27. Best Regards, Huang Ying --=-VJk2upsFck4jsAyQNqHH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmrTTcACgkQKhFGF+eHlpg0fgCglRYhZFChImUUx+WCVjf3fgWl BjEAn18jRsGh34Uiea76QZnAofn0Z51s =cCLp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VJk2upsFck4jsAyQNqHH-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/