Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:43:03 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: remove IRQF_DISABLED
Message-ID: <20090302144303.GA30136@elte.hu>
References: <1235996477.5330.174.camel@laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1235996477.5330.174.camel@laptop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 887
Lines: 25


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> Hi Linus,
> 
> Would you be willing to take such a patch?
> 
> Its a rather big one, but if you think its a good idea, I can 
> generate one against whatever tree is needed.
> 
> Provided I didn't break any !genirq stuff.. then again, that 
> might be a nice incentive to fix up those last few archs.

look good IMO. If there are no objections, and given that it 
modifies half a thousand of files i'd suggest we do this near 
the end of the merge window and not carry it in the genirq tree 
- while trivial it will still generate quite a bit of conflicts. 
Would that work with you?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/