Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757250AbZCBR5U (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:57:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754911AbZCBR5E (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:57:04 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:53849 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754397AbZCBR5D (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:57:03 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: remove IRQF_DISABLED From: Peter Zijlstra To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , lkml , linux-arch , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: References: <1235996477.5330.174.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:56:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1236016611.5330.971.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.25.91 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 582 Lines: 16 On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 09:11 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So this is not as simple as your patch. Not even _nearly_. Yuckness, yes that does complicate matters significantly. That leaves us trying to find all request_irq() invocations that do not have IRQF_DISABLED.. /me puts it on the todo list. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/