Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:24:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:24:04 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:47369 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:23:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:21:34 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Rik van Riel cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH *] new struct page shrinkage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > The patch has been changed like you wanted, with page->zone > shoved into page->flags. I've also pulled the thing up to > your latest changes from linux.bkbits.net so you should be > able to just pull it into your tree from: > > bk://linuxvm.bkbits.net/linux-2.5-struct_page Btw, _please_ don't do things like changing the bitkeeper etc/config file. Right now your very first changesets is something that I definitely do not want in my tree. Sure, I can do "bk cset -x" on the damn thing, but the fact is, I don't want to have totally unnecessary undo's in my tree on things like this. That's just stupid, and only makes the revision history look even less readable than it already is.. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/