Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:29:53 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: david-b@pacbell.net, tglx@linutronix.de, me@felipebalbi.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
       felipe.balbi@nokia.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, sameo@openedhand.com
Subject: Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...)
Message-Id: <20090302132953.27126b78.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <1236028617.18955.14.camel@twins>
References: <1235762883-20870-1-git-send-email-me@felipebalbi.com>
	<200903011454.22280.david-b@pacbell.net>
	<1235999772.5330.368.camel@laptop>
	<200903021304.56881.david-b@pacbell.net>
	<1236028617.18955.14.camel@twins>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 709
Lines: 20

On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:16:57 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> > > we should simply always disable interrupts for 
> > > interrupt handlers.
> > 
> > That would be why you have refused to fix the bug
> > in lockdep, whereby it forcibly enables that flag?
> > 
> > I've been wondering for some months now why you've
> > left that bug unfixed.
> 
> Because running irq handlers with irqs enabled it plain silly.

Do we get to revert irqstacks?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/