Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:42:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:42:36 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:28937 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:42:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:41:55 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH *] new struct page shrinkage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Btw, _please_ don't do things like changing the bitkeeper etc/config > file. Right now your very first changesets is something that I > definitely do not want in my tree. Since bk doesn't seem to let me remove the thing from the history (probably with some good reason), I guess you might as well import the following patch: http://surriel.com/patches/2.5/2.5.5-p2-struct_page5 As a side effect, this patch should reduce the whole thing to one changeset, which isn't all bad since we don't need to have the history of Linux cluttered up with all the minor changes to this patch ;) regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/