Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756986AbZCBXii (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:38:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752758AbZCBXia (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:38:30 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:39162 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752738AbZCBXi3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:38:29 -0500 Message-ID: <49AC6DEA.2050304@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:38:18 -0500 From: Masami Hiramatsu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , Steven Rostedt , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Linus Torvalds , Arjan van de Ven , Rusty Russell , "H. Peter Anvin" , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: make text_poke() atomic References: <49A82851.5080707@redhat.com> <20090227180724.GA17947@Krystal> <49A83237.40604@redhat.com> <20090227185316.GA19811@Krystal> <49A853CD.3020607@redhat.com> <49AC10E9.1090102@redhat.com> <20090302171914.GB21735@Krystal> <49AC5A87.7000604@redhat.com> <20090302222254.GA31962@elte.hu> <49AC63FA.70801@redhat.com> <20090302230915.GA11626@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090302230915.GA11626@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1356 Lines: 41 Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> So perhaps another approach to (re-)consider would be to go back >>> to atomic fixmaps here. It spends 3 slots but that's no big >>> deal. >> Oh, it's a good idea! fixmaps must make it simpler. >> >>> In exchange it will be conceptually simpler, and will also scale >>> much better than a global spinlock. What do you think? >> I think even if I use fixmaps, we have to use a spinlock to protect >> the fixmap area from other threads... > > that's why i suggested to use an atomic-kmap, not a fixmap. Even if the mapping is atomic, text_poke() has to protect pte from other text_poke()s while changing code. AFAIK, atomic-kmap itself doesn't ensure that, does it? Thank you, > > Ingo > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Masami Hiramatsu Software Engineer Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc. Software Solutions Division e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/