Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757638AbZCCP3W (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 10:29:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756334AbZCCP2z (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 10:28:55 -0500 Received: from hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de ([141.43.120.68]:58264 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756150AbZCCP2y (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 10:28:54 -0500 Message-ID: <49AD4C74.1060704@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:27:48 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: Greg KH , Jeff Garzik , wireless , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Elaboration on "Equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree" References: <43e72e890903022143k83890afr6673753f52c5ff8@mail.gmail.com> <49ACC6B0.409@garzik.org> <43e72e890903022244j2b2f4276lf6e318f3dad3df@mail.gmail.com> <20090303072637.GB4440@kroah.com> <43e72e890903022337k5281a790j8641f93cce3f9c70@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43e72e890903022337k5281a790j8641f93cce3f9c70@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1285 Lines: 29 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> Who are these "people" that you are trying to convince? > > OK small silly example is convincing distributions it may be a good > idea to carry linux-next kernel packages as options to users to > hopefully down the road reduce the delta between what they carry and > what is actually upstream. Distros would do their users a bigger favour if they didn't just dump a random new driver into their kernel package, but if they instead (or in addition) support the process to get new drivers into the mainline. It's a favour to their users because maintenance in mainline generally means better quality. (Less drivers which break suspend/resume etc. pp.). It's also a favour to themselves because the maintenance of their kernel as a whole will cost less if it is a stabilized derivative of the mainline instead of an unstable (and merely potential) predecessor of the mainline. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--= --== ---== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/