Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755498AbZCDHut (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:50:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752632AbZCDHuj (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:50:39 -0500 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:33389 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752504AbZCDHui (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:50:38 -0500 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <49AE32B5.9040603@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:50:13 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090104 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Galbraith CC: Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , Jan Engelhardt , Boaz Harrosh , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects References: <49ACF8FE.2020904@panasas.com> <1236093718.3263.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1236097526.3263.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303192212.GA20705@elte.hu> <1236115544.15993.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303214454.GA8288@elte.hu> <1236119990.24019.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303230323.GA21644@elte.hu> <49ADBE29.4040706@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20090303234834.GA13389@elte.hu> <49AE221D.9010909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <1236150752.6049.19.camel@marge.simson.net> In-Reply-To: <1236150752.6049.19.camel@marge.simson.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1582 Lines: 35 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 07:39 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: >> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> Yeah, these commits are in none of the topic branches that are >>> the git base of development, they are all already in a separate >>> branch named "tip:out-of-tree". >> So people should remember to retry without out-of-tree before reporting >> problems == remember to report against the development base. > > I'll bite, how does a gut-fu white belt accomplish that? How to do it is currently not quite obvious - for linux-2.6-x86.git users because the master branch contains out-of-tree.? Or maybe nobody should use the master branch, I don't know. - Ditto for linux-2.6.tip.git.? It was also impossible for users of the -rt patchset because the faulty patch was obviously included in a base patch in the -rt patch series.? As I said, I recommend that people do not receive those off-topic patches by default, only on demand. (Because I sometimes work with -rt users.) ?)http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=commit;h=4239438b08fe8ec149ddc530238ca131bf88d290 ?)http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commit;h=4239438b08fe8ec149ddc530238ca131bf88d290 ?)http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/3/424 -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--= --== --=-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/