Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755627AbZCGQ7m (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:59:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751511AbZCGQ7f (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:59:35 -0500 Received: from adsl99-243.ath.forthnet.gr ([79.103.126.243]:50906 "EHLO vergina.dyndns.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751161AbZCGQ7e (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:59:34 -0500 Message-ID: <49B2A7F0.1090101@asyr.hopto.org> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:59:28 +0200 From: Thanasis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: LKML Subject: Re: jffs2 and kernel config for SDHC Memory Cards References: <49B127AB.6070202@asyr.hopto.org> <49B12B71.7030300@asyr.hopto.org> <20090306182425.GB28349@silver.sucs.org> <49B18679.4030504@asyr.hopto.org> <20090306225746.GB25593@silver.sucs.org> In-Reply-To: <20090306225746.GB25593@silver.sucs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1668 Lines: 33 on 03/07/2009 12:57 AM Sitsofe Wheeler wrote the following: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:24:25PM +0200, Thanasis wrote: >> on 03/06/2009 08:24 PM Sitsofe Wheeler wrote the following: >>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:56:01PM +0200, Thanasis wrote: >>>> on 03/06/2009 03:39 PM Thanasis wrote the following: >>>>> I want to use two of these Transcend?s Class 6 SDHC (SD High-Capacity) >>>>> Memory Cards, >>>>> http://www.transcendusa.com/Products/ModDetail.asp?ModNo=147&LangNo=0&Func1No=1&Func2No=13 >>>>> as part of the filesystem in a netbook (Acer A110L), will mount /home on >>>>> one, and /tmp and /var on the other. >>> >>>> Let me rephrase my questions in order to be clearer: >>>> Q1: In order to achieve wear leveling should I format them as jffs2? >>> This probably won't be very effective as you are already past the > >> OK. I believe I should stick to ext2, right? > > If you mean compared to jffs2 then probably yes, better to stick with > ext2. Right, that is what I meant. If you mean is ext2 the best choice over anything else... well > that's an open question (or so I'm told). You would need to ask a > filesystem expert really but it apparently depends on the workload, the > characteristics of the "disks" and whether you need journaling. It is going to be a desktop (netbook) system, so, if it had a HDD, I would opt for ext4 or xfs, but given the hardware (SDHC), I guess ext2 is the best choice. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/