Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754128AbZCHSRc (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:17:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753341AbZCHSRY (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:17:24 -0400 Received: from col0-omc1-s8.col0.hotmail.com ([65.55.34.18]:15513 "EHLO col0-omc1-s8.col0.hotmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753126AbZCHSRX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:17:23 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 370 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:17:23 EDT Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [84.216.37.216] From: Peter Hallberg To: Subject: Re: doubt about path_walk() function Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:11:11 +0100 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Mar 2009 18:11:11.0817 (UTC) FILETIME=[43293390:01C9A019] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 904 Lines: 20 > linuxshield/scan.c|998| error: implicit declaration of function ?path_walk? > Searching in the internet, I can see that this function was removed in > one some kernel version, so how can I fix this problem ? It has been replaced with vfs_path_lookup, the fix for another fs looks like this: - ret = path_walk(cachename, &nd); + ret = vfs_path_lookup(nnpfsp->cachedir, nnpfsp->cacheroot, + cachename, + flags & O_CREAT ? LOOKUP_PARENT : 0, + &nd); _________________________________________________________________ Dela foton p? ett smidigt s?tt med Windows Live? Photos. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/