Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755174AbZCHWHs (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:07:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754514AbZCHWHk (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:07:40 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:44526 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754338AbZCHWHj (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:07:39 -0400 Message-ID: <49B44182.1030707@zytor.com> Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 15:06:58 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Wilcox CC: Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , Jesse Barnes , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: try to detect host_bridge pci_cfg_space References: <49B1C50E.5010209@kernel.org> <49B1C69F.70904@zytor.com> <49B1C81B.5010904@zytor.com> <49B1C8C1.4090304@kernel.org> <20090308110437.GA27811@elte.hu> <20090308145803.GL25995@parisc-linux.org> <49B4330C.1060700@zytor.com> <49B4343B.9050807@kernel.org> <49B43585.2050606@zytor.com> <49B436E4.1050103@kernel.org> <20090308220100.GO25995@parisc-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20090308220100.GO25995@parisc-linux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1187 Lines: 33 Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 02:21:40PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> Jesse or Matthew, can you pick this patch? > > Having reviewed it in light of HPA's comment, I don't have a problem > with it: > > Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox > > However, I don't think it's my place to take this patch while Jesse is > away; it doesn't feel like it's needed to be submitted between -rc7 and > 2.6.29. Do you have a reason that it needs to be merged more urgently > than 2.6.30-rc1? > I didn't see one... I was assuming it was a submission to be pushed upstream during the merge window. It doesn't fix a regression, so it doesn't seem to me to be a case for a late -rc merge. It's hardware enablement, so it *might* qualify for 2.6.29-stable, as far as I understand Greg and Chris' policies. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/