Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:50:07 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
       Ozan =?utf-8?B?w4dhxJ9sYXlhbg==?= <ozan@pardus.org.tr>,
       Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: suggest running a 64bit kernel on LM capable machines with plenty memory.
Message-ID: <20090310125007.GD11935@one.firstfloor.org>
References: <49B254C6.8010507@pardus.org.tr> <20090307193026.GA2165@x200.localdomain> <49B2CE44.4060305@pardus.org.tr> <87r617ojfi.fsf@firstfloor.org> <1236606168.8389.512.camel@laptop> <20090309191504.GB11935@one.firstfloor.org> <1236677828.25234.9.camel@laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1236677828.25234.9.camel@laptop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 686
Lines: 18

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:37:08AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 20:15 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > How about we do the below as well?
> > 
> > Idea looks good, but with your patch it would print two conflicting
> > messages ("use highmem64. No, use 64bit instead"), wouldn't it? 
> > Only one would be better.
> 
> Something like the below?

Looks good from the logic. Only nit would be missing grepability.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/