Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756526AbZCJO3S (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:29:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755394AbZCJO3F (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:29:05 -0400 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.184]:41492 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754959AbZCJO3D (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:29:03 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=uT9O3oeZoDa95ST7RlbV7iw99wkavrFuF4EhRKhGsAXfyJKtPzNv84eZKOgDYHkPXd tcjNNZHz46ptrgREEY5ouC++DgxHSgf3zRjEIiT2rgKi3JkI4xa4a9Vp+kCMj8tXHZ6Z /4uL/PpbYw45iZl37rKxhUinrKw8FXBhToCj0= Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:29:29 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: Jeff Dike Cc: Am??rico Wang , Geert Uytterhoeven , Rob Landley , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ARCH=um segfault on x86-64. Message-ID: <20090310142929.GG3157@hack> References: <200903060042.19084.rob@landley.net> <20090306084848.GO22605@hack.private> <10f740e80903060150p565e9703u81d4fe47cb599ab@mail.gmail.com> <10f740e80903060151w779bbd11ld2fcc437ac7ac321@mail.gmail.com> <20090306111834.GC8991@hack.private> <20090306143543.GA6983@c2.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090306143543.GA6983@c2.user-mode-linux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 883 Lines: 24 On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:35:43AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: >On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 07:18:34PM +0800, Am??rico Wang wrote: >> It does work well x86_64, but my question is that whether this will >> break i386 or not, since before, CONFIG_3_LEVEL_PGTABLES depends on >> EXPERIMENTAL on i386, this patch removes it. > >As long as CONFIG_3_LEVEL_PGTABLES is off on 32-bit, it should be fine. > >It did work, last I checked, but 3-level page tables on 32-bit is a >very rarely used combination, and not useful. > So this patch should be fine, right? :) Thanks for your comments! -- Do what you love, f**k the rest! F**k the regulations! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/