Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756395AbZCJQXT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:23:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754581AbZCJQXH (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:23:07 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:44179 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753889AbZCJQXE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:23:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] track files for checkpointability From: Dave Hansen To: Nathan Lynch Cc: Ingo Molnar , containers , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Alexey Dobriyan In-Reply-To: <20090310105702.43eb1402@thinkcentre.lan> References: <20090305163857.0C18F3FD@kernel> <20090310105702.43eb1402@thinkcentre.lan> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:22:45 -0700 Message-Id: <1236702165.10626.167.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 829 Lines: 21 On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 10:57 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote: > From a0fb96aa41c4d360559013cfd7f32f07f449c1c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Nathan Lynch > Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:23:02 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] checkpoint: make files_deny_checkpointing print task > name and pid > > This lets the developer know *which* task performed an action that > prevents checkpoint. Can you think of any case where we wouldn't be calling foo_deny_checkpoint() for a task other than current? Should we just use current in the function directly instead of passing it in? -- Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/