Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756130AbZCJQ0R (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:26:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753651AbZCJQ0D (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:26:03 -0400 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:37884 "EHLO e39.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752114AbZCJQ0B (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:26:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:20:26 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Nathan Lynch Cc: Dave Hansen , Alexey@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, containers , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Dobriyan Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] track files for checkpointability Message-ID: <20090310162026.GA9354@us.ibm.com> References: <20090305163857.0C18F3FD@kernel> <20090310105702.43eb1402@thinkcentre.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090310105702.43eb1402@thinkcentre.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1490 Lines: 44 Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl@pobox.com): > Please consider this and a following patch. > > >From a0fb96aa41c4d360559013cfd7f32f07f449c1c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Nathan Lynch > Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:23:02 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] checkpoint: make files_deny_checkpointing print task name and pid > > This lets the developer know *which* task performed an action that > prevents checkpoint. > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch > --- > fs/file.c | 2 +- > fs/open.c | 2 +- > include/linux/checkpoint.h | 13 +++++++------ > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c > index 0501af6..fcb2803 100644 > --- a/fs/file.c > +++ b/fs/file.c > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static void __scan_files_for_cr(struct files_struct *files) > continue; > if (cr_file_supported(f)) > continue; > - files_deny_checkpointing(files); > + files_deny_checkpointing(current, files); Ah but you can't do this, because __scan_files_for_cr is called from dupfd which is called during copy_files, right? So you'll need to send the task into __scan_files_for_cr, right? I do wholeheartedly agree with the idea though. thanks, -serge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/