Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757299AbZCJR25 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:28:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754974AbZCJR2s (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:28:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:43639 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753827AbZCJR2r (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:28:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:27:54 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Robert Richter Cc: Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Stephane Eranian , Eric Dumazet , Arjan van de Ven , Peter Anvin , Peter Zijlstra , "David S. Miller" , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [announce] Performance Counters for Linux, v6 Message-ID: <20090310172754.GB28767@elte.hu> References: <20090121185021.GA8852@elte.hu> <20090309013902.GK10085@erda.amd.com> <18869.40904.382716.827097@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20090310094457.GU10085@erda.amd.com> <18870.21428.868208.447605@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20090310162616.GI10085@erda.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090310162616.GI10085@erda.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1236 Lines: 33 * Robert Richter wrote: > On 10.03.09 22:49:08, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > Robert Richter writes: > > > > > Ok, maybe I mixed too much the architectural with the x86 model > > > specific implementation. My impression is that there is data in > > > generic structures what should be better private for the model or > > > architecture. However, I have to figure out the details here. > > > > The details of the x86 support have changed quite a lot since the v6 > > patch was posted, I believe. Are you looking at the v6 patch, or at > > Ingo's tip:perfcounters/core branch? > > I am using the tip branch, but took the v6 thread to discuss this. > > > > > Ingo - maybe it's time to post a v7 patch? > > For me it's fine to work with the branch if patches are posted > to the mailing list for review. all perfcounter patches are on lkml and you can see all -tip commits in general by subscribing to the linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org mailing list. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/