Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754997AbZCKLEZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:04:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754230AbZCKLEQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:04:16 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:43688 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753624AbZCKLEP (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:04:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:03:24 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ingo Molnar cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: x86: removing zImage support? In-Reply-To: <20090311102439.GA32512@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <49B703D4.1000008@zytor.com> <20090311102439.GA32512@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1035 Lines: 30 On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > I'm thinking again about removing zImage support. An > > "allnoconfig" kernel (with CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y to expose > > additional knobs, and CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y so it can do > > anything at all) is currently 487K on i386 -- very close to > > the upper limit of 512K for zImage. > > > > Are there *any* residual users of this, or should I just push > > a patch to remove it once and for all? > > Havent seen any zImage bugreport for years, so go for it. In the > unlikely case of someone still relying on it and having a good > use case we'll get a bugreport and can consider putting it back > in. I haven't seen any zImage for years in the embedded space either. Go for it. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/