Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:00:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:00:48 -0500 Received: from [194.122.47.18] ([194.122.47.18]:6923 "EHLO msnexch2.rkes.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:00:32 -0500 Message-ID: <91571DF701C0D211B7CA00805F628DBE23358D@BER1_B01> From: "Hinderling, Anselm" To: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: RE: /sbin/route problem with 2.4.0test Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:34:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Dries van Oosten [SMTP:D.vanOosten@phys.uu.nl] > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:17 PM > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: /sbin/route problem with 2.4.0test > > I have plowed my way trough the kernel-digest archives, but I couldn't > find an answer, so sorry if it's old news. > I have a machine running 2.4.0test8 and /sbin/route refuses to work. It > only prints the table headers and then nothing happens. I can stop it with > ctrl-c, but the actual routing table is not printed. I don't know much > about the changes between 2.2 and 2.4, so I looked up the routing table > struct in include/net/route.h. At first I thought the table remained the > same, because they were the same version. One closer inspection I found > that the entry inet_peer had been added to the rtable struct. Can this be > the cause of my problem with the route utility? > If so? What's the fix? > have you ever tried "/sbin/route -n" (or even --help ;-)? > thanks for your patience, > Dries van Oosten > > > > anselm. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/