Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 06:19:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 06:19:27 -0500 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:52497 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 06:19:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 03:06:46 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Jeff Garzik cc: Martin Dalecki , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.5 IDE cleanup 11 In-Reply-To: <3C74D18D.FCCFEA83@mandrakesoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > @@ -2929,7 +2928,6 @@ > > capacity: ide_cdrom_capacity, > > special: NULL, > > proc: NULL, > > - driver_init: ide_cdrom_init, > > driver_reinit: ide_cdrom_reinit, > > }; > > > > @@ -2967,7 +2965,7 @@ > > DRIVER(drive)->busy--; > > failed--; > > > > - ide_register_module(&ide_cdrom_driver); > > + revalidate_drives(); > > MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT; > > return 0; > > } > > hum, I'm not sure that removing ->driver_init is a good idea. > > Seems like a loss of flexibility to me, not a cleanup, and I wonder if > you have thought through all the paths that wind up calling > ->driver_init. Nah, go ahead add it. I have been meaning to start another driver from scratch that is fully threaded IO and can deal with register core operations independent of the how the arch calls the transport. Cheers, Andre Hedrick Linux Disk Certification Project Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/