Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752056AbZCLKHZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:07:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753372AbZCLKHG (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:07:06 -0400 Received: from fms-01.valinux.co.jp ([210.128.90.1]:37314 "EHLO mail.valinux.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753942AbZCLKHE (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:07:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:07:00 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20090312.190700.260100263.ryov@valinux.co.jp> To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, jens.axboe@oracle.com, fernando@intellilink.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com, taka@valinux.co.jp, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, arozansk@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, oz-kernel@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, menage@google.com, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Documentation From: Ryo Tsuruta In-Reply-To: <20090312001146.74591b9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1236823015-4183-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> <1236823015-4183-2-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> <20090312001146.74591b9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2.52 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1188 Lines: 29 Hi Andrew, > Also.. there are so many IO controller implementations that I've lost > track of who is doing what. I do have one private report here that > Andreas's controller "is incredibly productive for us and has allowed > us to put twice as many users per server with faster times for all > users". Which is pretty stunning, although it should be viewed as a > condemnation of the current code, I'm afraid. I'm developing dm-ioband, which is an another IO controller, and I would like to hear your comments about dm-ioband if you have. dm-ioband web page: http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/ > So my question is: what is the definitive list of > proposed-io-controller-implementations and how do I cunningly get all > you guys to check each others homework? :) Dm-ioband is implemented as a device-mapper driver, so I'm proposing dm-ioband to dm-devel and I hope device-mapper staffs take care of it. Thanks, Ryo Tsuruta -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/