Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:03:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:03:33 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:62213 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:03:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [DRIVER][RFC] SC1200 Watchdog driver To: zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz (Zwane Mwaikambo) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:16:55 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), wingel@acolyte.hack.org (Christer Weinigel), wingel@nano-system.com, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, roy@karlsbakk.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Zwane Mwaikambo" at Feb 21, 2002 04:27:34 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Thanks Alan and Jeff for the input, i'll cleanup this stuff. Out of > interest, do we normally take in patches for specialised embedded boxes? I A lot of the watchdogs are for specific embedded boards. It is improving as vendors (notably Intel) figure that watchdogs on the chipset are not much silicon and very useful > to integrate. I presume they'd get accepted if the code was broken up into > seperate modules instead of being overly specialised. For example, the > CRIS stuff in the Etrax tree (developer.axis.com). Etrax is an entire architecture - its a bit differently weird 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/