Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757498AbZCMIbE (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:31:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751757AbZCMIaq (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:30:46 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f175.google.com ([209.85.218.175]:47268 "EHLO mail-bw0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751120AbZCMIap convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:30:45 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 324 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:30:44 EDT DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hKJ1/Bjw4XoOKqGfGfdRsIaqf06+jK27CGex2eDk09RiZj+qsDAeDehWqEsJD8ozpv ezCb/map45iwtp7NvqMdiWj3gu5V3l9iOsugqw5uM5GdHaNL3gsglcZDJcPEyuUtOp57 kND6N4H2ENnJfs1AdI7k+pth3FLgBn33jwWTk= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200903122225.04560.rob@landley.net> References: <200903120437.03837.rob@landley.net> <20090312210216.GB14205@uranus.ravnborg.org> <10f740e80903121540i30fdaddr600ce21f4159530a@mail.gmail.com> <200903122225.04560.rob@landley.net> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:25:15 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1841e0d58c804a2c Message-ID: <10f740e80903130125u39abf6c2h2a61f6bb18e7500e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7. From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Rob Landley Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Greg Ungerer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1440 Lines: 29 On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 04:25, Rob Landley wrote: > Keep in mind I still haven't found an emulator for m68k that actually boots a > linux kernel, so my m68k support is purely theoretical.  (I poked at mess and > uae a bit today, but they don't do the "qemu -kernel" thing I'm using for the > other targets, and qemu itself only seems to support coldfire and not a full- > blown m68k.)  I'm following up on this because it's a regression.  Under > 2.6.28 the m68k target was building a kernel and root filesystem, but I don't > have hardware to run it and have never been able to test it, so isn't really > very useful for me.  It's really just there so that if qemu grows the rest of > m68k support (patches have been submitted but not merged), I'll be ready. An atari_defconfig kernel (at least the one from Linus-yesterday) boots fine on aranym (http://aranym.org). Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/