Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758902AbZCMNr3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:47:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752244AbZCMNrS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:47:18 -0400 Received: from ns2.uludag.org.tr ([193.140.100.220]:47398 "EHLO pardus.org.tr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753859AbZCMNrR (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:47:17 -0400 Message-ID: <49BA6364.6040407@pardus.org.tr> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:45:08 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?T3phbiDDh2HEn2xheWFu?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Capability to do correct frequency throttling and PM when the cpufreq drivers are compiled into kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 715 Lines: 19 Hi, Is the mainline kernel fully capable of detecting the processor model/family for using the correct power management stuff when all the cpufreq, powernow*, acpi_processor, etc. are made into kernel instead of loadable modules? Or more precisely, can we get totally rid of the userspace init scripts which probes, loads, tweaks power management modules by parsing some /proc files, when we make them in-kernel? Thanks, -- Ozan Çağlayan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/