Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758912AbZCMR4S (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:56:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751162AbZCMR4D (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:56:03 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:35672 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750852AbZCMR4B (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:56:01 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,358,1233561600"; d="scan'208";a="672763691" Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next From: reinette chatre To: Nico -telmich- Schottelius Cc: "John W. Linville" , Nico Schottelius , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , Linux Next Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20090313080030.GB3246@denkbrett.schottelius.org> References: <20090311073030.GA5284@denkbrett.schottelius.org> <200903110946.23280.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090311085229.GB4495@denkbrett.schottelius.org> <20090311184407.GG8761@tuxdriver.com> <20090312142003.GF30728@denkbrett.schottelius.org> <20090312173042.GD3410@tuxdriver.com> <1236882742.13699.28.camel@rc-desk> <20090313080030.GB3246@denkbrett.schottelius.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:01:06 -0700 Message-Id: <1236967266.31798.14.camel@rc-desk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2493 Lines: 59 On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 01:00 -0700, Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote: > reinette chatre [Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:32:22AM -0700]: > > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 10:30 -0700, John W. Linville wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:20:03PM +0100, Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote: > > > > John W. Linville [Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:44:07PM -0400]: > > > > > Any chance you'd like to try wireless-testing to help to isolate > > > > > possible sources of this problem? > > > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git > > > > > > > > v2.6.29-rc7-17155-g2f7ab92 looks good (as in: wlan works after several > > > > suspends and resumes). But it seems you do not add the full kernel version: > > > > > > > > sgnx20002:/home/nico/wireless-testing# git describe > > > > v2.6.29-rc7-17155-g2f7ab92 > > > > sgnx20002:/home/nico/wireless-testing# uname -r > > > > 2.6.29-rc7-wl-ikn > > > > > > > > Which is the kernel built some seconds before. > > > > > > I don't know where you get the -ikn bits from, presumably from the > > > iwlwifi project. Given what you said above, it would seem you are > > > getting your suspend/resume problems from them as well... :-( > > > > In our repo we do not add anything to the value of localversion. We also > > track wireless-testing _very_ closely so the differences are at most a > > handful of patches. Could you please send me commit id of iwlwifi-2.6 > > repo that fails as well as the commit id of wireless-testing repo that > > succeeds? > > As I did before in this thread: > > vmlinuz-2.6.29-rc7-wl-ikn-32831-g98c5597 from iwlwifi-2.6: fails > 2.6.29-rc7-wl-ikn or v2.6.29-rc7-17155-g2f7ab92 from wireless-testing: works I am sorry that I missed this information in the thread. > > Btw, I'm running 2.6.29-rc7-next-20090306-ikn currently, which also looks good. Your wireless-testing repository tested is much newer than the iwlwifi-2.6 one ... new patches for our driver is in your wireless-testing repo but not in iwlwifi-2.6. So, in your testing wireless-testing contains more up to date iwlwifi code than the iwlwifi-2.6 repo. Could you please test with today's versions of the two repos? There is a one small patch difference. Thank you Reinette -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/