DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id;
  b=K2uNUJjobfH1SfDev7IfrznlEtiG/oJPDYsBxAqRNCumAzrs97GADNQxNzcj0JzU/PzKKniEkywcdXezDglmumhU8xtuPmKw+aEVAKmztGZVp8YwFlXmLXgsdreTyo2ZKxPW+Vlx0R635nHuL+MvKfPWpbV868zwhfqd4EDKvKE=  ;
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: sidc7 <siddhartha.chhabra@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: COW optimization on exec
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:58:25 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.51 (KDE/4.0.4; ; )
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <22519639.post@talk.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <22519639.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200903151458.25363.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 932
Lines: 18

On Sunday 15 March 2009 13:57:54 sidc7 wrote:
> The Linux kernel uses the COW optimization for fork, so the processes share
> the same pages, till on of the processes writes to the page. I was
> wondering, if I do a fork and do an exec immediately following the fork,
> will the COW optimization still be applied as it is most likely that the
> new process is going to write to the shared pages? So doing a COW will not

exec throws out all those pages, so go away without ever having been
copied. However it still costs memory CPU time TLB flushes etc in order
to set up the COW optimisation in the first place, so if you are doing
fork/exec, then I think vfork is the better option.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/