Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756566AbZCPMRp (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:17:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752955AbZCPMRg (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:17:36 -0400 Received: from leb.cs.unibo.it ([130.136.1.102]:33309 "EHLO leb.cs.unibo.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752914AbZCPMRf (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:17:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:17:32 +0100 From: Renzo Davoli To: Am??rico Wang Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ptrace_vm: ptrace for syscall emulation virtual machines Message-ID: <20090316121732.GC22978@cs.unibo.it> References: <20090204080256.GC17452@cs.unibo.it> <20090310214456.GE5213@cs.unibo.it> <20090310220241.GC30475@elte.hu> <20090311134138.GD12753@cs.unibo.it> <20090316081508.GE3360@hack> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090316081508.GE3360@hack> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2054 Lines: 42 Dear Cong, Thank you for the detailed analysis of the code. I'll change the code taking care of your observations asap. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:15:08PM +0800, Am??rico Wang wrote: > >I have updated the patch, now it should be (more) consistent > >with the Coding Style specifications. > You can use scripts/checkpatch.pl to check it before sending. I read the coding style document and I used the perl script. However, the script is not able to cope with all the style specifications and I may have missed something more. > > >UML tests at startup which features are provided and uses PTRACE_VM or > >PTRACE_SYSEMU (or nothing). PTRACE_VM and/or PTRACE_SYSEMU support can be > >disabled by command line flags. > So what? PTRACE_VM is only supported in UML with this patch, > UML still has to use PTRACE_SYSEMU on x86_32. > > Am I missing something? :) This patch [2/2] is for UML (host and guest). Patch #1 provides PTRACE_VM for all the architectures supporting ptrace via tracehook. By applying both patches PTRACE_VM is available in the following architectures: x86*, sparc*, s390, powerpc*, ia64, sh* and um. (I have not tested all these architectures, but the patch applies to the core ptrace code, shared by all of them). Ptrace_vm then provides the same speedup of PTRACE_SYSEMU extending its support: - to other architectures: ports of UML or similar code for other architectures can use it - to other applications: PTRACE_SYSEMU supports the virtualization of all the system calls while by PTRACE_VM the VM monitor can virtualize some of the system calls, depending on some condition e.g. the value of a parameter. It is possible in this way give a faster implementation to partial virtual machines like my umview. With patch #2 user-mode linux also uses ptrace_vm where available. renzo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/