Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:06:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:06:03 -0500 Received: from delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl ([213.192.72.1]:9203 "EHLO delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:05:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:04:19 +0100 (MET) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Reply-To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Dan Kegel cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zab@zabbo.net Subject: Re: is CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP always a win? In-Reply-To: <3C75ED64.28CCFA6B@kegel.com> Message-ID: Organization: Technical University of Gdansk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Dan Kegel wrote: > The important files are a bit buried. The important ones seem to be > > ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/lbl-tools/README > ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/lbl-tools/libpcap-0.4-ss991029.dif.gz > ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/lbl-tools/libpcap-0.4.tar.gz > > The .dif file contains the first example I've seen of > how to use socket option PACKET_RX_RING. Too bad the changes did not get integrated -- libpcap 0.7.1 doesn't know anything about PACKET_RX_RING... -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/