Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761215AbZCPX4L (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:56:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753843AbZCPXzw (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:55:52 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.171]:9000 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751088AbZCPXzv (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:55:51 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KHRqvrQ2DvVlIjcg8tZicP9S801NfEwSsNSvXCqeH2MEBNn9egmNH8JGtXkEt/jd+g VAdPefXHXiOkqByY8sTcTkXlo0PDZ4bUPbEf9cWLIlQ74PU7i59U/h0IdnphY1RqkXR/ sTE2LfiQelEcle2a/9moq6e/VZRljJ2FptaEI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1237140665.24621.2.camel@johannes.local> <1237143683.24621.7.camel@johannes.local> <20090315202603.GA9077@elte.hu> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:55:49 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 From: Jeff Chua To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , Johannes Berg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , "John W. Linville" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1081 Lines: 25 On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > IOW, if you've pinpointed 71c11fb57b924c160297ccd9e1761db598d00ac2 as > being bad, then you should go back and double-check that its parent > (in this case 4607816f608b42a5379aca97ceed08378804c99f) is good. > Because if it's parent is also bad, then that just means that you made > some mistake in "git bisect". > In this case, it really sounds like maybe you marked the parent good, even > though you should have marked it bad. I should have been more careful, just got thrown off during the last few steps of the bisect. But with the bad association to the AP after a57a59f247b651e8ed6d3eeb7e2f9d83b83134c9 (iwlwifi: remove implicit direct scan), can someone suggest where to go from here? Meanwhile, I'll try bisecting again. Thanks, Jeff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/