Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758895AbZCQKMg (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:12:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754078AbZCQKM0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:12:26 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:38854 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753799AbZCQKMZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:12:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:12:16 +0900 From: Yasunori Goto To: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix the possibility of insane return value of hpet_calibrate() against SMI. Cc: Paul Gortmaker , Linux Kernel ML , robert.picco@hp.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, vojtech@suse.cz, mingo@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <49BE215F.7040307@ladisch.de> References: <20090316111300.7CE5.E1E9C6FF@jp.fujitsu.com> <49BE215F.7040307@ladisch.de> X-Mailer-Plugin: BkASPil for Becky!2 Ver.2.068 Message-Id: <20090317185152.47CD.E1E9C6FF@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.01 [ja] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1325 Lines: 39 Sorry for late response. > Yasunori Goto wrote: > > > I've no sense of feel for how long each calibration run would take. > > > Would doing it 5 times show up as a significant increase in the boot > > > time for those that care about boot time being as quick as possible? > > > > Hmm. The loop times is trade off against reliable value.... > > Though SMI is rare interruption, I don't know how frequent > > hypervisor's switch is. > > Could you, just for testing, run the calibration five thousand times or > so instead of five times, and count how often you get insane values? > (And how much delay does such an SMI add?) I tried 50000 times. But insane value was nothing. I think SMI is very rare. > > Each calibration of this has 1 milli second. > > Do you think 5 msec is too long? > > This shouldn't matter when booting. Anyway, I think it's possible to > increase TICK_CALIBRATE without losing too much accuracy. Hmm. If the person who is trying to reduce boot time for fastboot dislikes this impact, then I'll try Vojtech-san's way. Thanks. -- Yasunori Goto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/