Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:20:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:20:19 -0500 Received: from trained-monkey.org ([209.217.122.11]:62727 "EHLO trained-monkey.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:20:13 -0500 From: Jes Sorensen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15478.25001.512565.628500@trained-monkey.org> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:20:09 -0500 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Anton Altaparmakov , Troy Benjegerdes , wli@holomorphy.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bring sanity to div64.h and do_div usage In-Reply-To: <3C7660F5.FC238A7E@mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020208113710.04ecedf0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <20020207234555.N17426@altus.drgw.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020208181656.03862ec0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <3C7660F5.FC238A7E@mandrakesoft.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Garzik writes: Jeff> Jes Sorensen wrote: >> __mc68000__ is the correct define, I don't know who put in >> CONFIG_M68K but it doesn't belong there. Jeff> I disagree -- look at arch/*/config.in. Jeff> Each arch needs to define a CONFIG_$ARCH. Why? CONFIG_$ARCH only makes sense if you can enable two architectures in the same build. What does CONFIG_M68K give you that __mc68000__ doesn't provide? Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/