Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757512AbZCQQHq (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:07:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757536AbZCQQHd (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:07:33 -0400 Received: from fxip-0047f.externet.hu ([88.209.222.127]:39176 "EHLO pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756880AbZCQQHc (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:07:32 -0400 To: mingo@elte.hu CC: miklos@szeredi.hu, fweisbec@gmail.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <20090317152753.GD13895@elte.hu> (message from Ingo Molnar on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:27:53 +0100) Subject: Re: wrong timestamps in ftrace? References: <20090317152753.GD13895@elte.hu> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:07:21 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 936 Lines: 28 On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > So according to the timestamps the time difference between the first > > and last event was just 0.12s, which is rubbish. > > > > This is latest git on a CoreDuo T60 notebook. Attaching .config and > > dmesg. > > There's been changes to timestamping in the tracing tree. Could you > check whether latest -tip: > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README > > works better for you? Unfortunately no, it's behaving exatly the same. # uname -a Linux tucsk 2.6.29-rc8-tip-02571-g0fcb24f-dirty #9 SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 17 16:53:41 CET 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/