Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757399AbZCRDGW (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:06:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754937AbZCRDGJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:06:09 -0400 Received: from n12.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.125.209]:39674 "HELO n12.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751557AbZCRDGH (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:06:07 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 447339.33223.bm@omp409.mail.mud.yahoo.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=uHOemS0+O1n32/w3rp7ZjdvK4PYr75fABNAZn7vDlw2/iF8L2YP49ZEUJKPeBbqNHP3C1POLNd3NXFa+glALFdBQcBDhp71dRI2mxFlJzNEAe9pk8PO0Tow+Af44PIWoeVXyXMSQDCZdBRCfpJ9Zqn60eOBrVHi7yCHvyjIHub4= ; X-YMail-OSG: pq0QPWYVM1mqHsWpjw.JedLq.c9fufkGkxQsQxLKKggph5._NXd4kN5SqO21kZDdfyZ7xzUuTZJEoHsyqx3XV3PoPMRtnRFYRspX7kqm5gpvgGX7EG1MD.8A5zCq4EBdgWxpkuIkQgI5FRd8zSDOpDL5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:04:39 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Alan Cox , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , me@felipebalbi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, felipe.balbi@nokia.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, sameo@openedhand.com, tglx@linutronix.de References: <1235762883-20870-1-git-send-email-me@felipebalbi.com> <20090303103041.0ba4aebd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090303104836.GA11532@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090303104836.GA11532@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903171804.39557.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 917 Lines: 22 On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i think you severely over-estimate the importance and ratio of > drivers that enable irqs within irq handlers. (Nor does anyone > want to break them really - we want to have a sane default and > we want to flag the broken cases as broken.) For the record, I've been running for some time now with a patch that issues a warning for each IRQ that lockdep forces to use IRQF_DISABLED. On my x86 systems, pretty much every driver triggers that warning. Which makes me think maybe that shoe is being placed on the wrong foot: use of IRQF_DISABLED is the *EXCEPTION* not the rule. At least on one major Linux platform... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/