Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:23:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:23:09 -0500 Received: from mail.scs.ch ([212.254.229.5]:10118 "EHLO mail.scs.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:23:03 -0500 Message-ID: <3C768C80.C5C3DBE@scs.ch> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:22:56 +0100 From: Thomas Sailer Reply-To: t.sailer@alumni.ethz.ch Organization: SCS X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-21jnx i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samium Gromoff CC: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Ess Solo-1 interrupt behaviour In-Reply-To: <200202191412.g1JECvV12317@ibe.miee.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Samium Gromoff wrote: > " Alan Cox wrote:" > > Yes. It has diff fragment limits > So the point is we should fix esd, not the solo-1 driver, i presume? > (esd_fixed -> irq_load_fixed -> disk_io_is_back)... sounds ok Note that solo1 has differnet limits depending whether the program (esd) runs as root or not. root may shoot him/herself into the foot... Tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/