Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:11:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:11:12 -0500 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:27155 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:11:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:58:25 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Linus Torvalds cc: Rik van Riel , Andre Hedrick , Martin Dalecki , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Flash Back -- kernel 2.1.111 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus, Obvious you have a bug up the backside, so I am totally hands off until you and Martin are done. See you back at 2.5.10. I will not comment on the changes because you want something and I do not have the timetable to deliver and you are upset. I am more concerned with the stablity of the core of ATA/ATAPI and next in queue was to address the entire ATAPI data-phases issues that appear to have some problems. It is clear you want a cosmetic change and I am not ready to make one. Therefore I will be patient and wait for you get the facelift you want and then see what needs to be salvaged afterwards. --a On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > Martin, > > > > please tell us up-front if you are able to make Linux work > > with 48-bit IDE stuff so Linux is able to talk to drives > > larger than 137 GB. > > > > If you're not, please stop pissing off Andre and work > > together with him ... > > Rik, get off the high horse. > > 2.5.x already supports 48-bit LBA addressing. > > And quite frankly, it's not Martin who cannot work with Andre, it's Andre > who so far has shown himself _totally_ unable to work with anybody at all. > > Whenever somebody comes and even tries to do trivial and obviously correct > cleanups that do not actually change any semantics at all, Andre stands > out and shouts bloody murder from the rooftops, completely ignoring the > fact that he hasn't even looked at the patches. > > All the crap Andre has shouted about "IDE mess" and "timing changes" is > total and utter CRAP. None of the patches I've seen has changed _anything_ > but cleanups, or removed _any_ features. > > Guys, you need to realize that Martin is NOT the bad guy here. The problem > is not Martin, the problem is that Andre cannot take any level or > criticism, and in the five years or so that he has been maintainer I have > yet to see a _single_ person who has been able to work together with him > (as opposed to some people who have been able to maintain their own > subdrivers _despite_ him). > > Andre, your threats about not wanting to maintain 2.5.x are just a symptom > of this inability to accept the fact that other people actually do know > what they are doing, even if what they are doing is only cleanups with no > semantic changes. > > Rik, _look_ at the patches, instead of just taking Andre's word for it. > > Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/