Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756767AbZCRVCb (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:02:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755947AbZCRVCT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:02:19 -0400 Received: from smtp123.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.96]:41523 "HELO smtp123.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755898AbZCRVCS (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:02:18 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=u32xeR1AzUq7bWDX1uCJtIbW5TrxF33E8dFhup96QocN70G6uE9Er19AH5ozK0iekTLe0UwFqTnKStWRA/XmHcQggz3cNSGtlM9sFZm2AVRpSe+B3Mz4y1YSDMXBwOmNSjy1fiJ0Cd0KyDdnISOnKD8GO++dJYyJon+TTsdhTaM= ; X-YMail-OSG: QFFuRdQVM1nz7IsULfkzAJSujOcan0esJy5oAWerkeaFI2aUaT200jc_6bY1ZVSfPF6f5yjGLSzJXAN_VIrgqRwW2jJtc3IOMAYIlgVKdIxhA.u7BWu8DR.sCENi7MEgdEPuNHjDIUj2DRpurJEszyxsg_Xv5rAbQ4dUsqDzNRGfTRg64AoM7QTNY_x3XpkkmZs3hvYdf01UxnYz95BSJ__41EIOKg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.29-rc8 regulator-next] regulator: init fixes (v4) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:02:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Liam Girdwood , lkml , OMAP References: <200903111743.34708.david-b@pacbell.net> <200903181225.11444.david-b@pacbell.net> <20090318203317.GA6299@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090318203317.GA6299@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903181402.14384.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 790 Lines: 22 On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Mark Brown wrote: > > The $SUBJECT patch will prevent such things from existing. > > I sent a patch backing that specific change out along with the > late_initcall() patch. Huh? $SUBJECT patch hasn't merged. How could you have backed it out?? http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123707714131036&w=2 I didn't see such patches. Could you post URLs so I know specifically what you're referring to? In the future, when you're proposing patches you think address bugs I've reported, please remember to CC me ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/